Sunday, 1 June 2008

June 1st: Nestle Crunch Crisp

Kcal 240 Fat 13.0g Fat(sats) 13.0g Carbs 32.0g

Last month I reviewed the UK Crunch bars both of which scored in the upper 6's. Today im reviewing the US 'Crisp Crunch' bar that dedicated reader Justin very nicely sent to me in his box of goodies from the US.

The Cunch Crisp has a rather elaborate seven different layers...three interwoven wafer and milk chocolate creme layers topped with a layer of rice all of which has a chocolate flavoured coating. All seven layers constituted for a large 49.3g bar which was very adequete in settling my hunger.

So the on wrapper boring stuff...you may notice above the saturated fat content of the bar! No thats not a typo it does contain a staggering 13.0g of saturated fat...honestly Ive never come across a bar that contains so much per gram...quite staggering really but the ingredients list shows why this is the case. The bar contains two different types of hydrogenated oil: kernel and coconut....hmmm yuck! Whats even more suprising is that the bar dosent actually contain any cocoa butter :( thats really disappointing to be honest and really suggests this bar could have been made with better ingredients.

Above I described the intricate composition of the bar - this made for a great look and one that looked very appertising. Unfortunately its appearance was slightly let down due to the nature of how quickly the bar melted on my fingers...it was a little greasy feeling after only a few seconds of contact with my hands and did make them feel slightly messy....despite this it still looked the part. Out of the pack the bar offered very little in ways of an aroma, an ever so slight sweet smell but overly disappointing.

The wafer layers despite being in contact with the slightly moist chocolate creme retained a nice crispness - this was further excentiated by the rice which topped the bar. As the name suggested the bar had a nice crunch to it - this with the smooth chocolate creme made for a great arrangement of contrasting textures.

The bar despite containing no real chcolate ingredients was surprisingly chocolaty in flavour. The chocolate creme had a nice creamy chocolaty taste which complimented the malty wafer flavour nicely. The puffed rice ontop made for a nice cereal tasting undertone which added just another nice component to the overall taste. The sheer variation in flavour of the layers ensured the bar avoided becoming monotomous in taste and made this bar incredibly moreish.

Overall this is a better bar than the original Crunch bars we have here in the UK. The design of the bar is on the whole a nice one - it looks good and the nature of the interwoven layers make for an intresting combination of textures and flavours. My slight reservations with this bar came with its nutritional content and ingredients...im sorry but the inclusion of the hydrogenated oils is doing no one any favours...healthwise its a thumbs down...but also just think of the potential this bar has if these were replaced by more natraul actual cocoa ingredients...it already tastes nice and chocolaty it could get even better. I definately wouldnt recommend this to anyone on a diet but to the rest of us this is a great tasting bar that I suggest you try if you get the chance.

7.8 out of 10

12 comments:

Justin said...

That's insane! I never realized there was so much Sat. Fat. You have no reason to thank me for sending this one ;).

I usually just look at the calories and 240 for this substantial bar doesn't sound too bad. Guess I should be a little more careful. Too bad it tastes so good.

Thanks for the review and sorry.

Jim's Chocolate Mission said...

Justin haha dont be silly man it wa ridiculously kind of you to send it my way and im so glad you did as I had wanted to review it for ages.

Yeh 240 kcal is pretty standard to be honest..probably a little less than you would expect from such a big bar...but yeh the saturated fat content is pretty excessive considering that alot of the bar is wafer and cereal based.

Ho hum i should care im hardly on a diet :) would be pretty hard to be undertaking the ChocolateMission wouldnt it! I calculated today that I have eaten 175 unique chocolate bars since the start of the year! Pretty mad huh!

At the end of the day this bar was damn good tasting I will not dispute that for one minute...just think what it could taste like with some even better ingredients! Makes you wonder dosent it!

Anyway dont be so riduculous as to apologise im particularly grateful you sent this bar.

Cheers again bud and thanks for your continual input its really appreciated this end.

Thanks

Jim

Justin said...

The nutritional info may be why you don't have these in the UK. I know they're also available in Mexico.

Yeah, it is a pretty good tasting bar. All the same, I don't wish you a heart attack. Glad you got to at least try these. Double thanks for alerting me to the shocking stats.

Jim's Chocolate Mission said...

Justin No we dont have these in the UK because they are a half decent tasting Nestle product LOL! I dont know what it is with Neslte but they seem to hold alot of their really great products back from the UK market...they have some great KitKat flavours they have never released here etc Oh well if these were readily avalible I could see this bar as being one that I would treat myself to from time to time..unfortunately I dont have that luxury.

Cheers fella

Jim

Alan said...

thats very true jim, many nestle uk products could be better. im sure our Crunch bar looke dmore like thsi originally minus all teh layers etc, still just the chocolate and rice but flatter and squarer and you could see the crispy bits on the top much more than now.

cheers
Alan

Jim's Chocolate Mission said...

Alan I really wish they would release this and the Butterfinger Crisp over here in the UK ... lol they are just so much better than the actual original bars! Rather puzzling really. This Crisp Crunch actually looks remarkably similar to the original Nestle Crunch they have in the US ... just minus the wafer and stick the Crunch logo on top!!

From what you say their Crunch now is almost identical to what ours used to look like ... I found a pic of their bar now take a look --->

http://www.waynesthisandthat.com/images/cbcruchoutside.jpg

Thanks
Jim

Alan said...

its funny how they sorta recycle the bars and designs isnt it, for different markets? i dunno why, they should just be the same lol

cheers
alan

Jim's Chocolate Mission said...

Alan Its the way the organisations are run my friend... the brands are controlled through the regions ...Americas, Europe, Africas etc ... so all have different brand teams working on them ... so although they probably use the same pretence with the brands the obviously adapt the marketing to local tastes! Thats how I believe Nestle run things anyway!

Jim

Alan said...

Hey Jim,

yeah i imagine you're right, its prob why some are called different thngs for the same bar, ive even heard they use different names due to our name meaning bad or rude things in that language lol

maybe thats why the australian chocolate is not so nice, at least to us, due to a different formulation for the heat. but if theyre used to it it wont taste bad probably lol

cheers
Alan

Jim's Chocolate Mission said...

Alan Well I know Dairy Milk varies from region to region .. even from the UK to Irish!! Thinking about it rationally it would be impossible for it not to vary considering the different qualities in the ingredients ... lol that's why I guess I have to try every kind.... got to have al base covered now don't I ;)

alan said...

thats very true, it tastes different in scotland, when ive been on holiday, its had a different taste to the english one.

haha you do, and it must be very enjoyable trying all thse chocolates out! ;)

cheers
alan

Jim's Chocolate Mission said...

Alan I'm sure there are far more taxing hobbies lol!

Jim

 

blogger templates | Make Money Online