March 19th: Nestle Milkybar Shaker Egg

Kcal 110 Fat 6.2g Fat(sats) 3.9g Carbs 12g

Im yet to find a better white chocolate than Milkybar, so given the opportunity to review this Easters Milkybar egg offering from Neslte I was hardly going to be turning it down.

The egg is part of Neslte's unique 'Shaker' range which sees the traditional creme like filling found in most mini Easter products replaced with mini flavoured solid pieces - in this instance white chocoate flavoured rice puffs. The name is obviously dervied from the rattling noise that these small pieces cause as they shaken agaisnt the solid chocolate shell.

The egg had a sweet smelling vanilla like flavour typically found in most Milkybar products. I decided to eat this particular product by biting off the top of the egg empyting the contents and eating the rest of the shell whislt nibbling away at the rice pieces.

Tastewise this egg was delicous, The shell was thick and thoroughly enjoyable. The change of format did not have a profound change in the taste and it was much the same sweet vanilla type flavour I found with the Milkybar Chunky I reviewed in January. The puffed rice particles also added a nice texture to the mix, they were similar to rice crispies in density but had far more flavour and subsequently added a nice variaton in texture to the thick dense shell.

Overall this was a nice concept that was executed well by Nestle. Milkybar is a very popular product and it would have been all too easy to just release a Milkybar egg with some form of white chocolate creme, Nestle have introducded a new concept to the egg market by going agaisnt the grain and bringing something new to the table with the 'Shaker' concept. Tastewise your never going to go wrong withMilkybar and if your after something a little different this Easter I would recommend you give this a try.

8.0 out of 10

March 19th: Nestle Walnut Whip Vanilla

Kcal 174 Fat 8.9g Fat(sats) 4.9g Carbs 21.6g

Previously produced by Duncans these have been manafactured since 1910 - thats one hell of a history; surely this must mean this product is something special!? Walnut Whips have come in many different flavours over the years, it was to my great suprise I learnt that this vanilla flavour is currently the only variant in production.

The build of the Walnut Whip is unique yet simple: a very light fluffy whipped centre is encased in a cone shaped milk chocolate shell - topped off with a single walnut. Despite its rich heritage this actually came in a rather modern snazzy blue foil wrapper - personally I think they are missing a trick here and more a more traditional wrapper would suite the product more.

Moving onto more important aspects....the Walnut Whip lacked any distinct sort of smell: a faint sweet chocolate smell could be detected but there was little more than this. Upon tasting the product I was immediately disappointed; I decided to first eat the walnut so delicately placed ontop of the cone shape. To my disappointment (and more disgust!) the walnut tasted really rather stale and lacked any sort of taste worthwhile mentioning...not a good start.

The chocolate shell wasn't too bad - the chocolate was far from glorious yet hardly insulting; one thing that was rather pleasant about it was its relative thickness. The flavour of the 'Whip' is described a vanilla yet im still struggling to see where this flavour is adopted. The centre of the whip is nothing short of woeful! In texture I would say it can be likened to whipped cream, in regards to taste I would liken it to candy floss...pretty much 100% sugar. It really adds nothing more than a sickly taste - nothing even close to being vanilla flavoured at all.

Overall I cannot understand how this product has survived so long with other quality products readily available on the market. The Nestle website claims that a Walnut Whip in the UK is eaten every two minutes which is really quite remarkable considering I have had one and would probably never consider buying one again. This dosent come with a recommendation from the Chocolate Mission though I guess on balance I have had worse.

5.9 out of 10

March 18th: Nestle Heaven Black Magic Egg

Kcal 146 Fat 9.0g Fats(sats) 5.5g Carbs 14.6g

Easter is fast approaching and todays offering from Nestle comes in the form of a spin off from the Nestle Heaven range.

Im not too familiar with the range but to my knowledge it is based around chocolate truffles which are avalible in bars and of course packs of individual truffles. This egg is billed as a 'Dark chocolate shell with a rich dark truffle centre'..sounds good in theory.

In size the egg was significantly smaller than the Cadburys/Galaxy eggs I have reviewed over the last couple of days weighing in at a rather small 28g. In design the egg had no pattern work at all and to my suprise rather easily straight down the centre of the egg from top to bottom with very little force - it was more than apparent that this egg is built fusing two halfs together rather than a egg shell filled -despite its relative unattractivness this did have its advantages though. A problem with the previously reviewed eggs was that the filling inside was ill proportioned and sunk to one end of the egg; this was not the case with this Black Heaven egg as the filling was half filled in one side and half in the other, this ensured a perfect balance of filling and shell with every bite.

Unfortunately despite its slightly fortunate design success its taste was rather disappointing. Despite the differences in texture in the shell and centre (one being crunchy and the other slightly smooth) there was no distinctive change in taste. The Dark chocolate was altogether rather sweet and sugary and did not have the slight bitterness you would expect and want from an egg offering a dark alternative to the rest of the market. This sweet taste although not overly disatisfying came across quite monotomous and paled in comparison to other Dark chocolate offerings I have had of late.

Overall the taste of this egg was ultimately disappointing in due to its small size really unfufilling. Although Nestle seemed to have solved the problem of the ill proportioned filling, this has been at cost to not only the asthetic appeal of the egg but also to the whole eating experience itself. The difficulty of eating the creme egg and equivalents is actually half the fun of the egg format itself - taking this away does indeed proportion the feeling and cause less mess but in all it does take something away from the fun of this format. The flavour with this egg was also quite monotomous and unless your a fan of the Nestle Heaven range I generally reccommend you look elsewhere this Easter - not overly disatisfying, just I think there's better out there.

6.9 out of 10

March 18th: 3 Musketeers Mint

Kcal 150 Fat 5g Fat(sats) 3.5g Carbs 26g

Not wanting to deviate from my recent habit, I again indulged in another mid afternoon treat; this time I turned my attention to across the pond and helped myself to this little imported snack from the US - the 3 Musketeers with Mint and Dark Chocolate.

The 3 Musketeers with Mint came in a 35g serving split into two familiar shaped bars as shown above. The bar is relatively different to the original 3 Musketeers bar which I reviewed a few weeks back - not only in size but in build aswell.

The Milk chocolate coating has been replaced with a far darker more bitter Dark Chocolate alternative, its flavour was strong yet avoided being overpowering and definately suited the bar more due to charateristics of the centre im about to describe.

The centre of mint flavoured nougat retained the whippy soft texture of the original 3 Musketeers yet was certainly different in flavour. The mint flavour is an intresting concept and is certainly original interms of Im currently unaware of any other mint flavoured soft nougat bars on the market at present. Not only was the flavour original but it was actually quite refreshing and was sweet enough to finely balance agaisnt the slight bitterness of the chocolate. The mint flavour also provided a fantastic smell upon opening the bar and certainly gave a clear indication of what to expect interms of the taste.

Overall if your a fan of mint chocolate like I am, you can go very little wrong with this offering form Mars. The only slightly puzzling nature of the bar is natrually its size; it is only half the size of the original 3 Musketeers and if you are wanting something more substantial than just a tasty light bite you will be left disappointed (and hungry lol!). This small grumble aside this is one heck of a tasty bar and is a perfect cure for the mid afternoon/morning munchies. This bar comes highly reccommended.

8.2 out of 10

March 18th: FREE THORNTONS EASTER EGG!!

Click on the link below to claim your free Thorntons Egg:

http://www.recommendthorntons.co.uk/new_welcome.aspx

...seems like the real deal but Im expecting these to be the mini eggs they are selling at an RRP of £0.59

....Dont ever say Chocolate Mission isnt worth reading now :D enjoy everyone :D

Jim

March 17th: Galaxy Chocolate Caramel Egg

Kcal 190

The Easter Etravaganza continues with the egg version of Galaxy Caramel. The first thing that struck me about this egg was the pattern that was etched into the side of the egg - it was absolutely identical to the pattern on the Dairy Milk with Caramel egg, quite puzzling considering the obvious different manufactures - hmmm puzzling can anyone shed any light on this?

The similarities didn't end there, as this Galaxy egg was surprisingly exactly the same size and weight of its Cadburys equivalent. I ate the egg exactly the same method as the previously reviewed eggs - chilled, hollowed out and then the shell. The aroma of the egg was glorious and had the same sweet smell that was instantly recognisable from the ever so brilliant Galaxy Caramel bar (that currently jointly leads the Chocolate Mission table!!).

Biting into the egg it was quickly apparent that the caramel had become far thicker due to its chilled nature. It was actually rather solid and had sunk right to the bottom of the egg meaning that the top third was completely chocolate. It was also quite apparent that the amount of caramel in this egg was significantly less than in the Dairy Milk product. I couldn't help but feel a little let down by this - and that disappointment was compounded even more after eating it. Of course the egg tasted absolutely glorious - the chocolate was full of all Galaxy goodness and the caramel was smooth and full of flavour - spectacular and I can fault it little in this department. Unfortunately the egg also suffered from the same proportioning problems as the Dairy Milk with Caramel egg. The caramel sunk to one end of the egg meaning that one end had significantly more filling than the other - this wasn't unexpected but it still effected the overall product quality.

Overall there is no doubt this is one tasty egg that will certainly be enjoyed by who ever is lucky enough to indulge in one (or more :D) over Easter. Similarly to the Cadburys equivalent, in comparison with the bar format it is also available in, it does fall short as the proportioning is imbalanced due to its egg shape and its hunger fulfilment potential is not as great because of its size. The Cadburys Creme egg is still leading the way in the Easter Mission, but if you after a tasty caramel easter treat you can go little wrong with this Galaxy offering.

8.4 out of 10

March 17th: Milky Way Crispy Rolls

Kcal 130 Fat 6.8g Carbs 15.4g

Continuing my trend of having a tasty small treat mid afternoon, today my attention when browsing the confectionary fixture was grabbed by the delightful looking Milky Way Crispy Rolls.

A 25g pack contains two 'milk chocolate covered wafer biscuit fingers with a lightly whipped filling'. Upon picking up the packet I was suprised at how light they felt, I was careful not to let go of it for fear of them floating away - they are really that light!

Opening the packet I was greeted by two long sticks that looked quite reasonable asthetically but offered very little in any sort of aroma. One thing that was quickly noticeable was the rate at which the chocolate melted on my fingers as i handled the sticks....it literally took seconds; believe me I was in no warm environment - the office was freezing!

Biting into the sticks provided a mix of textures, the crunchy wafer provided a nice crunch and the whipped centre provided a nice smooth creme too the mix. The flavour department is where this product really struggles though. None of the elements really have a strong flavour - especially the whipped centre. The strongest flavour comes from the wafer and in all honesty it offers very little more than your average supermarket own brand ice cream cone (flavourless!!). The chocolate fails to have any impact on the tastebuds and offers little more than a greasy coating.

Overall this is a product that I would reccomend you avoid. The product concept itself is not a bad one - just the execution of it is poor. The product is really rather tasteless and lacks any potential of relieving any sort of hunger or chocolate urge due to its lightweight flavourless constituants. Unless your really curious I very much urge you to leave well alone.

4.4 out of 10

March 16th: Cadbury Mini Eggs

***UPDATE*** 18.03.2010 ***

Cin over at Foodstufffinds has recently been investigating in to a potential recipe change for Cadbury Mini Eggs (See HERE). To help her out I went and bought a pack myself, and I have to say I agree with her findings.

My own observations are that Cadbury have somehow managed to make these taste even sweeter than before. I think that this is because the shells are even thicker than they used to be, making them even more dominant flavour wise. As you can tell from my review below I am no Mini Egg lover so I could well be wrong here!?

What do you guys think?? Have you noticed any differences?


Kcal 15 Fat 0.6g Fat(sats) 0.4 (per Mini Egg)

Similar to the famous Creme Egg, these are another seasonal Caburys product that only make an appearance around Easter time - good thing I picked some up today then.

Cadburys Mini Eggs are small sized solid chocolate eggs encased in a thin sugary shell. They look absolutely stunning and the colours as you can see above are very authentic and make them look particulalry individual.

Aswell as the sugary shells making them look impressive, they also add a nice crunch to the product and this plays off well against the solid chocolate. The solid chocolate centres were standard Cadbury quality, and offered the same sweet, creamy tasting goodness you get with all Cadburys Chocolate products.

Unfortunately despite the sugar shells really being the unique point of the product, they also brought about the products greatest problem. I found that after about ten mini eggs the taste of the sugary shells became more and more dominant. I found these Mini Eggs extremely sweet tasting, and at times overpowered the chocolate completely just leaving me with a very artificial sugar taste in my mouth.

Overall these are a pleasant product in moderation, but I find the taste quickly becomes monotonous and quite sickly. I would say these would be fine to have round the house/work place to enjoy when you fancy the odd nibble, but I cannot recommend these as being a 'great chocolate product'. I think that despite their strong roots with being seen as a classic Easter product there are better alternatives out there to be enjoyed this holiday season.

6.8 out of 10

March 15th: Cadbury Dairy Milk with Caramel Egg

Kcal 190 Fat 9.8g Fat(sat) 5.7g Carbs 23.3g

The Easter Extravaganza 2008 continues and today I indulged in Chocolate Missions current leader the Cadburys Dairy Milk with Caramel ... this time though in egg form.

The Caramel egg is exactly the same build as yesterdays Creme egg but obviously with the Creme Fondant centre replaced with a massive (and I mean massive) helping of Cadburys Caramel. The outer shell was equally as thick as the Creme egg and it looked exactly the same in appearance and size.

Again I let this egg chill for a good few hours in the fridge before I indulged; this made sure the caramel was lovely and firm when it came to eating and avoided any sticky mess that would probably occur if the centre was less viscous.

Upon opening the egg I got that same delightful sweet caramel smell that I got when opening the bar form...I cant tell you how much I was looking forward to this. I ate this egg in a similar method to how I ate yesterdays creme egg. I removed top of the egg and then ate away some of the centre - leaving a thin coating round the the rest of the chocolate before eating away at the shell. Taste wise no surprise this was simply amazing. The caramel was thick, gooey and ever so sweet - of course the chocolate was delightful as ever and its chilled nature gave it that extra cracking sensation which complimented the soft smooth caramel so well. Both of the flavours combined meant it was a truly indulgent experience that left me with a big smile on my face :D truly delicious.

Overall I can safely say this is going to be one of the better Easter products on the market - it was divine in both it's flavours and textures. The only thing that I was left pondering after eating it though was whether it benefited from being in the egg format - personally I think not. When eating the bar the sheer beauty of it was the proportion of chocolate and caramel were so brilliantly proportioned each bite that you got the correct amount of each time. This isn't quite the case here as the caramel is obviously just placed in the centre meaning that its nearly impossible to eat it at the same rate as the chocolate shell. Another slight issue with the egg format in comparison to the bar is that you obviously get less - 38g vs 50g!! booooo! I would rate this egg slightly less than the Creme egg for the sole reason that I believe the Creme egg filling flavour works better in this format (egg). Still if your a caramel lover you can go little wrong with this splendid helping from Cadburys. Bravo again Cadbury!

8.6 out of 10

March 15th: Cadburys Fudge

Kcal 110 Fat 3.7g Fat(sats) 2.0g Carbs 18.4g

Two reviews in a day again?!! Uh oh this isnt getting to be a good habit :D Similar to yesterday the munchies hit me mid afternoon and I needed a sweet little snack...cue the Cadburys Fudge bar.

Its size and shape its very similar to the chomp I reviewed yesterday. The bar weighs a meager 25g and comes in the form of a long thin smooth bar, about the same size as a Chomp but a little thicker.

The bar has a centre of soft fudge coated in a very thin layer of Cadburys Dairy Milk and came in a nice looking orange and purple wrapper.

Despite putting the bar in the fridge for a good hour the bar was still suprising soft when I came to eat it - this bar in texture was certainly alot less chewy that the Chomp bar I reviewed yesterday and the fudge centre offered very little resistance against my bite.

Taste wise the fudge is very sweet - this is not surprising obviously with it being fudge and mostly made of sugar but what I'm trying to get at is that it didn't have a particularly distinct creamy fudge taste that you might wish. The chocolate layer is alot thinner than in comparison with the Chomp and for this reason you don't really get the Dairy Milk taste come through; the sugary fudge is certainly the dominant flavour.

Overall this again did a job in providing a nice snack sized treat between meals, but it lacked the fulfilling feeling you want to get from a chocolate bar. In terms of how it could be improved I would suggest Cadburys enlarge the size of the bar by adding far more Dairy Milk Chocolate..I think a thickish layer of hard chocolate against the soft fudge layer could be a real winner if proportioned correctly.

6.2 out of 10

March 14th: Cadbury Creme Egg

Kcal 170 Fat 6.0g Fat(sats) 3.7g Carbs 27.7g

What a place to kick off 'Jim's Easter Mission 2008' than with the most famous symbolic Easter chocolate in the universe - the Cadbury Creme Egg.

For those of you that are unaware of what one is (where have you been lol!!!) the product is in size the same as a standard meduim sized egg and is formed of a generous helping of creme fondant in the centre of a thick Cadbury Dairy Milk shell.

The egg comes in a very nice looking thing foil cover, which is traditionally covered in the famous red, yellow and blue colours. It certainly looks the part in the wrapper but the real treat is when it has been peeled away.

The famous slogan for Cadbury Creme egg is 'How do you eat your's??'...well here's how I ate mine. I left it for a few hours in my fridge...took the egg out and removed about 4 cm from the top of one of the ends. I then ate a large proportion of the fondant but left a small layer all around the chocolate shell inside; I then slowly bit by bit ate my way through the shell, letting eating bite melt in the mouth...a truly wonderful experience.

In terms of taste both components are glorious - the fondant centre somehow avoids being too sickly and has a glorious sweet tasting flavour. Its texture is brilliant as well - its thick and viscous yet smooth on the tastebuds - in a word sensual. The chocolate shell is thick and has that melt on the tongue aspect that Dairy Milk so successfully encompasses.

Overall what a great way to start my Easter reviews. The Cadbury Creme egg is an all time classic and its no wonder why its so popular and adored by the masses. The Creme Egg captures everything an Easter egg should be - fun to eat, pretty to look at and of course glorious to taste. This is going to take some beating in terms of finding a better Easter product. The only aspect that slightly lets the product down is its size...its so tasty you want more..this just leaves us one question!?...Cadbury where is our Super Sized/King Sized Cadbury Creme Egg! Welcome to the top 5 Creme Egg :)

...More Easter Goodies tomorrow

8.8 out of 10

March 14th: Cadburys Chomp

Kcal 110 Fat 4.7g Fat(sats) 2.6g Carbs 16g

Work seemed to be dragging for agessss today and sitting at my desk at 3pm my stomach was rumbling - Fast forward to 3.15pm and after a brief walk down to the staff shop, before I knew it I was surround by mini Cadbury Treats.

At the little cost of 15p the Chomp bar is a small snack sized bar (23g) that comprises of a layer of chewy caramel covered in Cadbury Chocolate. It's basically a Cadburys Curly Wurly..just not shaped as oddly. Opening the foil wrapper a nice Cadbury smell emanated and the small bar looked nice and smooth.

Biting into the bar I was met with a rather thickish layer of Cadbury chocolate (relative to it's size anyway). The Cadbury chocolate taste was like you would find in almost all Cadbury products - sweet but with a milky creamyness. It's nice to know that although the price and size of the bar is smaller, the same amount of care and quality is given to the chocolate. The chewy caramel was identical in taste to the one found in the Curly Wurly, in that it was nice blend of butter and sugar. Not only was it great tasting but it also had an interesting chewy texture.

Overall this bar did it's job, but I was still hungry after eating it. Unfortunately due to its size it wont satisfy any serious degree of hunger/chocolate pang, and that explains its slightly lower than average score. The Curly Wurly is not much bigger in size and its surprising there isn't a much larger version of this bar available. I'm sure it would be exceedingly popular if it were.

6.9 out of 10

March 13th: Toffee Crisp

Kcal 227 Fat 12.4g Carbs 27.4g

This bar has been amongst the most requested to be reviewed since Chocolate Mission started so it was about time I got round to it :)

The bar came in a 44g serving which felt surprisingly light, the bar in appearance is rather flat and is compromised of 3 main components; a thin coating of milk chocolate, a layer of chewy toffee and finally a base of crispy chocolate flavoured rice.

These three different components combine for a vastly ranging texture base which is certainly the unique selling point of the bar - it definitely differentiates it to others bars in the confectionery market and makes the experience a more interesting one.

Upon opening the bar I was greeted with a sweet smelling caramel like aroma, there was a small bit of toffee leakage but we can forgive that :)

Tastewise the bar is simply quite delicious. The chocolate coating is creamy and of a good standard but could definitely do with with being a great deal thicker, I cant help but feel if this was the case, the texture would also benefit more if there was a slight cracking feel to the chocolate as you bite into it. The toffee flavour is glorious and proportioned nicely in the bar its chewyness and sweet taste never becomes overpowering or sickly and Nestle have done a good job making sure an optimum amount is included. The Rice base also does its job rather well; it has a nice chocolate taste and is held together well through the use of a small proportion of toffee flavoured glaze.

My only disappointment with this bar aside from the thinness of the chocolate layer, was the fact that it simply didn't fill me up. I could have easily eaten another straight after - and although this is also a testament to how good it tastes, when compared to other bars in terms of hunger fulfilment this didn't quite do the job.

Overall this is a great tasting bar that deserves its good reputation. To reiterate, its only shortcomings come in the forms of the thinness of the chocolate and the lack of sustenance it provides. These minor issues overlooked and you are left with a flavour packed bar that has a really interesting variety of textures.

8.5 out of 10

March 12th: Duncans Ginger

Kcal ??? Fat ??? Fat(sats) ??? Carbs ???

Following on from yesterdays Original Hazelnut bar from Duncans today I sampled another of their offerings - the 'Ginger' variant in their range.

Again this came in the form of a 58g and was split into 12 equal sized chunks, this is where the similarities stop though as the chocolate and more obviously the flavour differed.

Unlinke yesterday upon opening the aroma and subsequent flavour of the bar was all too apparent. The bar had a distinct ginger smell which was certainly more appertising than yesterdays less fragrent offering.

This bar uses 'plain' chocolate with 55% Cocoa solids instead of the milk variant as with the Hazelnut bar yesterday. The chocolate had a very rich taste yet moreish taste, Im not the greatest connisseur of plain/dark chocolate but this was amongst the finest I have ever tasted; I did also detect an undertone flavour similar to coffee, wether this was just my tastebuds or this was intentional im unsure. Do not be mistaken this chocolate is divine and definately some of the best tasted on chocolate mission thus far.

Despite the chocolate being delicous the strongest flavour of the bar is of course the ginger. Flavourwise the ginger tastes very natraul and not at all artifical like you find with some of the more obscure flavoured bars. The disperion of ginger is generous and even throghout, it is neither too intense or weak tasting - a god job done here by Duncans.

There is just one slight problem with this bar - and its the texture. The combination of the heavy coca laden chocolate and sometimes spicy flavoured ginger meant the bar became quite dry. At times the texture became almost grainy and dare I say it similar to the 'sawdust' like texture I found with the 'Divine Fairtrade White Chocolate'.

Overall theres no two ways about it this bar has some extraordinary flavours, the proportions of glorious chocolate and well proportioned intresting flavoured ginger is nothing short of superb. Unfortunately it is a combination of the two which brings about its downfall, as they both contribute towards the bar having a poor texture which to a degree ruins the experience. If you ever come across this bar I would definately urge you to give it a try - its a pleasent bar which is great if your looking for a chocolatey flavour hit that is different to the norm.

8.1 out of 10

March 11th: Duncans Original Hazelnut

Kcal ??? Fat ??? Fat(sats) ??? Carbs ???

This range is little known outside of Scotland but was reccomended to me by a reader of Chocolate Mission, so of course being the devoted man I am I immediately obliged and put some of their bars on order.

The bar I sampled today was the 'Original Hazelnut'; its simply milk chocolate with whole hazelnuts dispersed generously troughout. The bar came in a 58g serving split into 12 bite-sized blocks as shown above. Although the packaging is smart, it did as you can see above lack nutritional information which isnt the greatest advert - oh well.

The bar itself had a slight nutty smell - always a nice start with a bar with nuts in ;) The chunks broke away nicely despite the presence of whole hazelnuts and each chunk was equally proportioned - no mean feat when you are dealing with large chunks of whole nuts as experienced with other similar bars.

The chocolate itself was extremely creamy, it had a stong coca taste and genuinely tasted like a high standard chocolate you would find in the more specialist of chocolate outlets like Thorntons. The nuts also also had a pleasent taste; unlike in some bars I have tried where the nuts are glazed to give them a sweeter taste (Galaxy Promises Hazelnut) these were left natraul which allowed a organic nutty flavour to come through. The fact the hazelnuts are completely untampered with means generally they are found whole within the bar rather than chopped. Not only does this benefit the bar texture wise adding real crunch, but it also stops small annoying bits of nut getting stuck between your teeth.

Overall this is a great tasting bar and one of the better whole nut bars I have tasted. I would definately reccomend giving this bar a try if you enjoy nutty chocolate bars, this could be your new favourite chocolate bar...just remember where you read the review first ;) A decent score for a nice tasting chocolate bar, more from this range tommorow.

8.0 out of 10

March 10th: Cadburys Double Decker

Kcal 275 Fat 11.3g Carbs 41g

I hadn't had a Double Decker for years but by popular demand and many requests today I bucked that trend and purchased one on my way to work.

The Double Decker is one of the bigger bars you will find in your local newsagents. It weighs in at a hefty 60g (slightly less than your average Snickers at 62.5g) - its interesting to note that although not the highest in fat per 100g in comparison to other bars it certainly packs a punch in Carbs; over 41g which I can tell you without looking will mostly be sugar.

Despite its size the bar was distinctly lacking in smell when opened. It had a faint sweet chocolately smell but that aside the lack of aroma was surprising and hardly whet the appetite.

The Double Decker consists of 3 main components: an outer layer coating of Cadburys Milk Chocolate, a thick layer of nougat and a crispy cereal like base. The Nougat is intresting, it has a flavour that it hard to pin down; it has a dominating chocolate flavour but with a hint of coffee. Unfortunately the flavour of the nougat is particularly sweet tasting and due to the sheer amount packed into the bar it was unsurprising that the taste became rather sickly by the end of the whole bar. Texture wise the nougat avoided being overly chewy and was quite light in comparison to other alternatives.

The outside coating of the bar is your typical great tasting Dairy Milk, unfortunately the thickness of the coating was not substantial enough and its flavour was quickly engulfed by the aforementioned plentiful nougat. This is something that Cadburys should really address.

The cereal base is where this bar really shines. It is absolutely delicious and is remarkably similar in taste to rice crispy cakes - you know the ones you used to make when you were little ;) The base provides a nice crunchy element to the bar and is fused well together by a small, but greatly proportioned helping of caramels. This ensures the layer doesn't simply crumble away but still avoided being overly sweet. This element of the bar could, and certainly should be applied to other parts of the Cadburys range; I could see this working particularly well replacing the wafer element in the Cadburys Picnic!

Overall a filling bar that just needs a slight adjustment in its ingredients proportions to make it a top 5 contender. The nougat for me is too dominant and makes the bar ever so slightly too sweet tasting by the time you have finished it. The soft nougat texture against the crisp cereal base works particularly well, and as mentioned above the cereal base element is certainly something that greatly helps this bar achieve a greater than average score. Its a story of nearly but not quite for the Double Decker...The Chocolate Mission continues :)

8.5 out of 10

March 9th: Reese's Nutrageous (US)

Kcal 280 Fat 16g Fat(sats) 5g Carbs 27g

This is one of only a few Reese's products that are widely avalible in the UK; so natraully I decided to sample the US version as shown above :) dont ask me why; the only difference I am aware of between the two products is that UK version is the King sized US version. To clarify I sampled the 51g bar; which was by all means sufficent enough to curb my hunger.

The bar is similar in build to the Baby Ruth but with a peanut butter centre replacing the nougat. The coating is pleasent enough - the whole peanuts provide a nice crunch but seemed to lack flavour compared to the coating found in the Baby Ruth. The chocolate was lacking in the flavour department - this has something I have found to be uncommon in Reese's products; to my taste the chocolate generally used in their poducts is lacking in taste and slightly waxy in texture: its by no means unpleasent - far from it infact but this is certainly an area the bar could be improved.

The peanut butter centre was typical Reese's just the right creamy smoothness with a slight saltyness. Its consistency is also a thing to note - its sturdy and dosent crumble - avoiding being too thick, chewy and nougat-like. The smooth of the centre works particularly well with the crunchyness of the whole nuts in the coating. Another nice addition to the bar is the presence of caramel between the coating and peanut butter centre. The caramel is unlike the one used in the previously reviewed caramel cups and is far from being as sickly. It plays a nice role of making sure the coating sticks to the centre whilst providing a nice sweet tasting moistness which is delivered in the perfect amount.

Overall a mixed bag - some elements of this bar are genious. As ever with Reese's you cannot fault the peanut butter they use in their products. It is always delivered in the right quantity and with a great mix of creamy saltyness - a flavor that dosent leave your mouth for long afterwards. The inclusion of caramel as mentioned above is an idea that works well and prevents the outside coating from simply falling away from the centre. Unfortunately the bar lets itself down in the coating department. Whilst the nuts deliver a nice crunchy texture they lack the flavour of other alternatives I have reviewed; also not bucking the trend in my reviews of Reese's products the chocolate is again sadly lacking an immersive taste. Despite my minor criticisms this is a nice tasting bar and im sure the majority of people would enjoy it - give it a go.

8.3 out of 10

March 8th: Thorntons White Chocolate

Kcal 250 Fat 15.7g Fat(sats) 10g Carbs 29.8g

The last week I have been sampling and reviewing some of the UK's most popular and common bars so today I thought I would break the trend and go for a more upper class stylish plain bar.

I have tried a few different brands of White Chocolate thus far on Chocolate Mission and have had mixed results: some have been overly sweet whilst others (most notably Milkybar) have performed well and scored in the Mid 8's.

Todays offering came from Thorntons - a simple 50g solid white bar of chocolate split into 6 chunky blocks. The wrapper told me that it was made from full cream milk and upon opening there was a strong milky poignant aroma.

The chunks broke off easily and cleanly and despite lacking any design work on the chocolate it looked clean cut with no scuff marks and ultimately professional.

The taste of the bar was quite similar to Milkybar in that instead of going down the over powering vanilla tasting route, the dominanting flavour was milky and resultingly pleasent. The texture was smooth and avoided being grainy which I had found in other variaties of white chocolate (Divine).

Overall this is a great white chocolate offering and I would say the best white chocolate I have had to date. The taste avoids being overly sugar rooted meaning that the texture is smooth and the taste flavoursome whilst avoiding being too sickly or artifically vanilla flavoured. I would whole heartidly recommend this if your a fan of white chocolate.

8.6 out of 10