Wednesday, 13 January 2010

March 6th: Snickers (UK) ... Updated ** January 13th 2009 - Snickers More Nuts

Kcal 299 Fat 16.9g Carbs 30.6g

Whats going on!? Well rather than write a whole new review for the Snickers More Nuts limited edition bar I decided to simply add my thoughts to the original and include some new pretty pictures.

The Snickers More Nuts includes 10% more peanuts than normal Snickers bars and is currently in distribution throughout the UK. Since I first reviewed the Snickers 2 years ago the bar has decreased slightly in size (damn you Mars) to 58.0g though personally I still think it is as satisfying as they come in relation to other bars on the market.

To be honest had the packaging not been shouting out the fact it contained more nuts than the original I might not have picked up on it, however I did notice that the nuts were also included in the nougat when I took the cross-section picture.

The peanuts unsurprisingly came through a little stronger in the taste but to be frank the difference was pretty minimal. I guess some may be a little disappointed that this bar lacks originality when compared to some of the limited editions they get in the US but personally this is still one of my favourite bars of all time and I still think that the way each of the different caramel, chocolate, nougat and peanuts components combine to provide a variable taste is nothing short of delicious.

Overall this limited edition doesn't take this bar any further in my estimation though neither does it detract from it's original excellence - it would be great to hear your views! Please see below for my original review and scoring chart.

****

Kcal 319 Fat 17.8g Carbs 34.1g

The Snickers bar (originally named Marathon) has been around since well..forever. It has appeared in many variations (including the Almond version which I have previously reviewed) though today I have reviewed the original UK version.

Currently on TV and wrapper the bar is being endorsed by the one and only Mr T; and there is a reason for that - this is one manly bar. Weighing in at a hefty 62.5g and containing a whopping 319 calories this bar certainly packs a punch; luckily for Mars Inc this becomes all but insignificant as this bar is truly delightful in every manner.

Upon opening the bar you are greeted with the sweet smell of peanuts and chocolate; in a word it smells glorious - and it has the taste to match.

The bar is formed of a thick layer of chocolate flavour nougat, with a generous helping of peanuts and caramel - all covered in milk chocolate. Taste wise the nougat is extremely flavoursome, its sturdy texture compliments the gooey yet crunchy mix of the nuts and caramel yet still holds a creamy compelling taste of its own. The nuts provide a delicious slightly salty nutty taste which didn't leave my mouth for ages after eating. The Chocolate although taking a bit of a back seat compared to the other flavours was still delicious and smooth. Mars really have done a great job with making sure each component of the bar is near perfect and right in proportion - it is no wonder why this is an all time classic.

Overall this bar is easily on a level with the best I have tasted whilst on 'The Chocolate Mission'. As I have described above, each flavour of the bar is delivered expertly and the different elements work together in both taste and texture to deliver an ultimately tasty and fulfilling experience. I don't expect many bars to reach the level of this bar - cracking stuff.

9.4 out of 10

January 13th: Cadbury Cake Bars Jaffa / Vanilla

Just when I thought it was safe to take my hands off the keyboard and stop writing about cake bar products Cadbury just had to bring out two unannounced limited edition variants didn't they!? Gracing supermarket shelves across the country these 'Jaffa' and 'Vanilla' cake bars are being promoted to hell by Cadbury - I managed to pick these up on a £1 a pack, BOGOF deal ... at 10p a cake bar they might as well be giving them away.

As with the rest of the range these multi packs came in the usual packs of five. As I sometimes do I nabbed a few from each of the packs for myself before leaving the rest of my work office to help themselves to what was left - the only thing to report here was that uptake on the Jaffa flavoured bars was a lot quicker!

In regards to presentation my thoughts were pretty so-so! Both variants looked like I expected with the Jaffa having a orange jelly filling, whilst the vanilla had a fluffy looking white centre. Below are my quick thoughts on each. To save time blabbing on about the quality of the golden sponge in each I think you will be unsurprised to hear that it was of a pretty average quality across both variants, so let me just focus on the fillings!


Cadbury Cake Bar Jaffa:

Kcal 120 Fat 4.9g Fat(sats) 2.8g Carbs 18.4g (per bar)

'Golden sponge with a jaffa flavoured topping' ... sound familiar!? ... 'covered in milk chocolate' ... ok maybe not quite a McVitie's Jaffa Cake bar rip off then!

It may not be a complete like-for-like comparison but I can't help benchmarking this Cadbury Jaffa to it's McVitie's opposite. Truth be told it simply work as well as the McVitie's as the outer milk chocolate was just a little too sweet when combined with the sharp sugary flavours of the orange jelly centre. I am not saying I am a great admirer of the standard of the dark chocolate the lines the McVitie's bar but I have to say it's unsweetened nature works better than the sugary Cadbury milk chocolate did in this bar.

7.0 out of 10



Cadbury Cake Bars Vanilla:

Kcal 155 Fat 8.7g Fat(sats) 4.7g Carbs 17.7g (per bar)

'Golden sponge topped with a vanilla flavour creme, covered with milk chocolate' ... hmm the more I think about this the more I am starting to believe Cadbury released both of these to piss off McVitie's .... MilkyWay Cake Bars anyone!?

These were pretty bad to be honest! They weren't near being inedible but they were probably one of the worst variants of cake bars I have reviewed over the last six months. The outer chocolate was standard Cadbury quality with it's sugary, milky taste but things went awfully down hill from there. The centre had a pretty nasty sweet taste that had an undertone of artificial sweetener bitterness. It had a hint of vanilla to it but I was more distracted by the strange bittersweet concoction of salt, sugar that dominated my tastebuds. It was odd to say the least and it in no way left me wanting to experience it again.

6.1 out of 10

Overall so what have we learnt here!? Well having thought it through it looks to me like Cadbury wanted to throw their weight around by bringing out two flavours of cake bars that are pretty much direct competition for two of McVitie's products ...*slow clap* for Cadbury!! Personally I thought both of these variants were below the standard of others from Cadbury's Cake Bar range such as the Mint, Original and Caramel flavour bars and it was pretty obvious how quickly these had been rushed to market with very little attention paid to the issue of quality. Now I don't even like Bournville dark chocolate ... but here is an idea for you ... Cadbury Cake Bars Jaffa but with Bournville dark chocolate! Any genius could of thought of that! Not only is dark chocolate and orange a better combination but it creates 'new news' for the Bournville brand of Cadbury and stops Cadbury looking so pathetic ripping off their competition so indiscreetly!! Readers thoughts are most welcome ...

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

January 12th: Milka Nussini Haselnuss

Kcal 205 Fat 13.0g Fat(sats) 5.5g Carbs 19.5g

Once again I have to thank ChocolateMission reader Susie for making this review possible as she so kindly sent me this bar to review all the way from Germany last year. Milka is one of the biggest chocolate brands in Germany and they have a portfolio that is as large as anyone with several sub brands supporting the main line of chocolates that they produce. Having recently dug into their 'Tender' cake bar range I today got my first chance to try their Nussini wafer offering in the form of this Haselnuss variant which was comprised of 'hazelnut flavoured wafer, with hazelnut creme, covered in Alpine milk chocolate'. The king of the wafers for me has to be the Nestle Kit Kat, but I was interested to see if Milka could put up some reasonable competition.

This bar came in a surprisingly large looking size and wasn't half as light as I was expecting with it weighing in at 37.0g. Aesthetically the packing incorporated all the usual Milka characteristics with the purple colour and Milka cow logo giving the wrapper a familiar looking design. Splitting the packaging open I was pleased to see that the inner lining was foil based and it kept the bar looking and smelling in a great condition with some nutty scents immediately evident. Splitting the bar in half it was nice to see the distinct layering of the hazelnut creme and wafers sitting below the nobbly milk chocolate surface which was lined with chopped hazelnut pieces.

Biting into the bar one thing that was straight away confirmed was the expected pleasantness of the outer milk chocolate which displayed its usual creamy, milky taste. Normally Milka milk chocolate is noted with a hint of hazelnut anyway but with the added chopped nut pieces in the coating the usual hint of woody nut was accentuated and more pronounced in taste. One thing that I love about the Nestle Kit Kat so much is the crispness of the wafer though this was not quite the same case here with this Nussini bar. In comparison to the Kit Kat the wafer layers in this bar were a little softer and even felt a little chewy when bitten into. As I expected the wafers didn't offer much in terms of taste, however the inner hazelnut creme further supplemented the outer nutty flavours leaving a lasting hazelnut note in the mouth long after chewing. As aforementioned this bar was surprisingly large in size and by the time I had finished it I did feel somewhat satisfied with my hunger subsided.

Overall I think the score below is possibly a little on the harsh side but I did have to punish this product for its lacklustre wafer textures. I am not the biggest fan of wafer generally, however one thing I just really don't like is when they are soft and lacking in crispness as it just gives me the impression that the product is over its best before date (it was still 6 months inside!). Although the softness of the wafers hardly spoilt this product it still made it pale in comparison to a bar like the Nestle Kit Kat whose wafers are normally so crunchy and offer a little more in terms of taste. One thing I did really enjoy about this product was the addition of the hazelnuts, which really brought a bit of life to taste even in their chopped and creme formats. If your a fan of Milka I think this would be a product you would get some pleasure from. This is nowhere near what I would describe as a 'must try' chocolate but it was a fun change up from the Milka norm.

7.0 out of 10

Monday, 11 January 2010

January 11th: Morinaga Dars Crea - Chestnut & Caramel / Noisette

Buy this product HERE from J-List

The Japanese stuff just keeps on coming doesn't it :) Today I decided to cram two products in to the one review so I will try and keep things as succinct as possible.

Making it's ChocolateMission debut, Morinaga is the manufacture in the line fire today and over the last few weeks I have been trying out some of their chocolates from their Dars Crea range. According to the J-List website Morinaga was the first ever confectionery company in Japan, and Dars are one of their most popular brands.

The two flavours I have been trying out were two
latest limited edition Dars - the Chestnut and Caramel & the Chocolate Noisette variants. Both came in boxes that contained several foil wrapped chocolate coated nuggets - I would hazard a guess that there were about 15-20 pieces which lasted around a week or so during our household over Christmas.

In regards to presentation these were distinctly Japaense and I mean that in a good way. The outer boxes were made from high quality material and were decorated with enticing pictures of nuts being draped in chocolate in addition to the bold branding and and Japanese writing. I thought the chocolates themselves were surprisingly small but they looked and smelt impressive with chestnut variant particularly standing out in regards to the latter.

Below are my thoughts on both the flavours ...

Morinaga Dars Chestnut & Caramel:

Kcal 325 Fat 24.8g Carbs 22.4g (per 52.0g)

I can't say I am all that experienced with chestnuts myself but as soon as I revealed to my old man (my dad haha) what these were I knew he was going to be able to determine whether these encapsulated the flavour nut well given how far his eyes lighted up :)

Combining a outer layer of milk chocolate with a chestnut cream and caramel centre these bite sized chocolate nuggets proved to be very tasty indeed. Although I was somewhat sceptical at their small size at first by the time I had tasted one I thought they were just about the right size given how sweet they were. Popping the first piece in my mouth the first thing I noticed was how similar the outer coating was to Kinder chocolate. It was smooth in melt and substantiated a sweet chocolate milk like taste before the flavours of the centre came to the party. The inner creme was exceedingly smooth and had a nutty taste which had sweet floral undertones with just a minor fruity influence. If I had to compare it to anything it would be like Kinder Bueno but less nutty and more buttery. I thought they were simply delicious.

8.2 out of 10


Morinaga Dars Crea Chocolate Noisette:

Kcal 330 Fat 25.1g Carbs 22.4g (per 52.0g)

Out of the two this sounded the more familiar sounding product and came described as 'chocolate nuggets with a hazelnut creme centres'.

One thing that immediately noticeable was that aesthetically the outer chocolate was darker coloured than the Chestnut & Caramel and this came through in the taste as well. Indeed, the outer chocolate was a tad less sugary with these Chocolate Noisette though I wouldn't say the cocoa flavours came through all that much stronger. The chocolate was still pretty fine tasting, though the filling really took hold of the taste here with the hazelnut and cream flavours coming through strongly from the outset. In comparison to the above the filling was more savoury tasting and a touch saltier which is something I can see many preferring.

7.9 out of 10


Overall this has been a pretty successful first outing for Morinaga on ChocolateMission and both myself and the rest of my family would give both of these flavours a thumbs up. Out of the two I would say the most distinctive and interesting was the Chestnut & Caramel chocolates which both me and my dad thought were delicious with their sweet nutty centres. I wouldn't say that they are the sort of thing that you would want to eat with the aim of having a satisfying snack but it if it is just a sound bite chocolate flavour hit you are after I would say both are delightful options.

Sunday, 10 January 2010

January 10th: Slim Fast Heavenly Chocolate Delight

Kcal 95 Fat 3.0 Fat(sats) 1.0g Carbs 14.0g

I know what you are all thinking ... 'Jim why on earth are you reviewing another Slim Fast chocolate bar after last weeks abomination!?' Well despite not being sucker for punishment I do believe that if you are going to do a job you should it properly - so if I say I am going to review the Slim Fast range ... I'm gonna review exactly that! That said I introduce to you today the other chocolate option in the Slim Fast snacks collection - the Heavenly Chocolate Delight. Just like the Nutty Nougat this variant didn't have an on pack description but I can reveal it was a bar formed of predominantly chocolate and rice crispie pieces.

Shock horror this Heavenly Chocolate Delight was a whole 1.0g smaller than the Nutty Nougat and not surprisingly was similarly inadequate hunger fulfilment wise. On the whole I thought the presentation was a bit of a step up from the previous Slim Fast offering and though I was still not entirely impressed with the lack of information on the wrapper I thought the bar itself looked a lot more appetising. In fact upon opening the wrapper I have to admit I was pretty surprised at the tempting chocolaty scents that emerged ... hmm maybe this was too surprise me after all!?

To answer my pondering question of above in short - yes I was even further surprised at how much better this tasted than the Nutty Nougat. Just as I expected the main constituents of the bar the rice cereal took centre stage in the taste and they established a sound base set of flavours that added sugar, flour and salt influences in to the bargain. Playing somewhat of a background role the cocoa came through in waves, with some bites having stronger chocolate bursts which only guess was down to them containing some small chunks of plain chocolate. Just as with the Nutty Nougat I had eaten the thing before I knew it and it did very little to satisfy my raging hunger at the time - back to the biscuit tin it was!

Overall I guess I have to throw some congratulations in the way of Slim Fast here as at least they didn't create another bar quite as bad as the Nutty Nougat. To be honest that wasn't exactly ever going to be hard to achieve given how awful the last bar was, but to more positive about things this was approaching being relatively good. The rice crispie cereal and chocolate combination wont exactly be new on anyone and the bar was still criminally small but in regards to taste I thought it didn't do anything too wrong. If I had to improve the bar I would have made the chocolate stronger tasting and would have ramped up the thickness of the outer coating to make the initial bite into the thing more pleasurable as it would have had that fine crispness. Of course all these improvements would have ramifications on the calorie column which I guess is the whole point of the product. One can't help but ask though - doesn't a single chocolate biscuit have less calories and fat but give ten times the taste .... hmm I will leave you to ponder that one!

6.5 out of 10

Saturday, 9 January 2010

January 9th: '7Days of Chocolate Reviews' - Edition 28

### Jim's Corner ###

Hi All,

I hope you all my UK readers have survived the big freeze this week and have stocked themselves up on their favourite chocolate bars .... you have to think about nourishment in weather like this people :)

What went down this week!? Well nothing really apart from the start of a month of Japanese and Diet themed chocoaltes. Japanese wise we had the Kit Kat Sweet Potato and the Lotte Sasha Original Chocolates ... which can both be found at J-List - HERE. I also kicked off my yearly look into the world of diet friendly chocolate with the Slim Fast Chocolate Nutty Nougat - HERE.

Coming next week we have more of the Japanese and diet chocolate markets, aswell as the latest Cadbury cake bars ... be sure to check the site.

Have great weeks and please keep the discussions on the posts.

JIM


News from the Chocolate Market

* Mars are bringing out a limited edition Snickers bar that has 10% more nuts in than a standard bar ... See HERE

* Werthers (makers of Werthers Originals) are bringing out a range of bagged chocolates ... See HERE

* The latest from the Cadbury take over bid can be read up on HERE


Post from other blogs I enjoyed this week:

* CandyBlog - Cybele recently did a fantastic post detailing the 110 Essential Candies for Cadivores ... check it out ... See HERE

* TheImpulsiveBuy - Marvo reviewed some wonderful looking McDonald's Frappes ... not that I could seen dead in an establishment like that of course :) ... See HERE

* GiGi Reviews - Gi geared up for her upcoming British week by reviewing the Terry's Chocolate Orange ... See HERE

* Foodstufffinds - Cin has been seeking out all the latest Walkers Crisps flavours on the UK market ... found out what they are ... See HERE

* ChocaBlog - Dom reviewed a Guiness flavoured chocolate bar ... yes you read that right GUINESS flavoured ... See Here


*** Stars & Their Bars ***

Rather than do big Stars & Their Bars posts I have decided to incorporate two answers into the 7 Days of Chocolate Reviews posts each weekend. So what did these Celebs say to the question ... 'What is your favourite chocolate bar?'

Will Carling - Ex England Rugby Union International


Matt Horne - Comedian / Actor from BBC's Gavin & Stacey

Friday, 8 January 2010

January 8th: Montezuma's Milk Chocolate & Butterscotch

Kcal ??? Fat ??? Fat(sats) ??? Carbs ???

A Montezuma's product that isn't from their 'Speciality Bars' range? What am I up to!? Indeed, even I was surprised when I saw this latest bar turn up from Montezuma's as it was at last a bar that offered something just a little different from the twelve other Montezuma's products I had reviewed previosuly. This bar came described as 'dark side milk chocolate with butterscotch pieces' and like every Montezuma's bar that had gone before was formed of totally organic ingredients. Although I don't buy much into the whole organically produced claims I think it is worth noting the business principles that Montezuma's operate as according to their packaging they operate through 'trading fairly' regulations with all their business partners from beans to bar. I think that is always nice to hear especially from some of the smaller companies whose profit margins have to be pushed already.

As I have already mentioned it was nice to finally try a product that was a slightly different proposition to the Speciality Bars range and this product came in a 100.0g size. Unfortunately just like every Montezuma's product I have reviewed before I had the same mixed feelings when it came down to the presentation. On one hand the outer cardboard packaging looked fantastic with the black background setting a sophisticated tone with some clever use of nicely styled fonts. Inside though the chocolate itself was a different story altogether as it kept within one of Montezuma's famous tacky looking plastic wrappers whilst also looking boringly plain with no patterns or branding on the blocks. Of course my preference would have been for the chocolate to be kept within a foil packet but at least a fairly strong aroma of cocoa was evident once the wrapping was split.

Over the last few years I have often criticised Montezuma's milk chocolate for being unremarkable and lacking a distinctive taste but I was pleased this wasn't quite such the case here. As the description suggested ('dark side milk chocolate') the level of cocoa solids used for this bar was relatively high (54%) and this was thankfully truly evident through the taste. Unlike previous Montezuma's milk chocolates I have tasted the flavours were evident as soon as the chocolate hit the tongue and a cocoa centric taste was immediately established supported by a strong under current of creamy milk flavours. The chocolate hit was strong with a slight smokey note, however still remained relatively sweet with a dried milk undertone that was present throughout the taste. The butterscotch element was perhaps not implemented quite as generously as I might have hoped though in almost every bite a small hint of caramel and toffee could be detected whenever a small crunchy crystallised piece was found within the smooth melting milk chocolate. With the chocolate really packing a punch in the flavour department this wasn't a bar that needed to be eaten in vast quantities and a 30.0g serving was more than satisfying.

Overall this was definitely one of the better Montezuma's products I have had in awhile and it was at last nice to see a bit of boldness from their milk chocolate. I thought that the 'dark side milk chocolate' concept really worked and much preferred this recipe to their standard milk chocolate which I personally think lacks a distinctive taste compared to some of the other more massed produced chocolates on the UK market. Although I really enjoyed the execution of the chocolate in this bar I sill think that the butterscotch element could have been done just a little bit better and I think it could have been portioned a bit more generously as some bites lacked the presence of butterscotch completely. Having tried my fair share of disappointing products from Montezuma's it was nice to finally see them step up and their game and I will definitely be trying more from this standard bar range. If you are a person looking to dip their toes in the dark chocolate market without being too adventurous I think this would be a great bar to start off with.

8.1 out of 10

Thursday, 7 January 2010

January 7th: Slim Fast Chocolate Nutty Nougat

Kcal 95 Fat 3.0 Fat(sats) 1.5g Carbs 16.0g (per bar)

For the past two years when I have taken a look at the site traffic figures I have seen a consistent January dip in the number of visitors accessing the site. Why would this be you ask!? Well I happen to think it is the 'New Years Resolution Lose Weight' crew staying away from potential temptation. In a bid to get to these people back on board just like last year I have decided to look at some diet friendly chocolate snacks, starting with this Slim Fast Chocolate Nutty Nougat. Containing just 95 calories and only 3.0g fat the Slim Fast 'Plan' suggests that this bar should be consumed as one of three snacks to be eaten throughout the day.

The bar came in a 25.0g size and was bought for the price of 50p in my local Tesco. In hand the bar looked pretty miniature but it was about the size of a two Kit Kat. I thought the foil wrapper looked relatively smart but I would have liked the on-pack picture to have been clearer given that there was no description of the actual contents. upon opening the packet and cross-sectioning the bar I immediately noticed that the chocolate, caramel and peanut constituents were all pretty minimal. The bar did emanate a sweet smell however it did little to stir my anticipation to any great degree.

Given that this bar was formed of milk chocolate, caramel, peanuts and nougat I guess we can assume this was going to be just as good as a Snickers but only 95 calories right!? .... haha lets not kid ourselves :) As I had observed through the cross-sectioning process (very precise skill I will have you know!) the chocolate and caramel layers were extremely thin so it was unsurprising they were lacklustre in taste. In truth the overall experience was very dimensional with the main contributor in flavours being the nougat layer which dominated all the other elements. The nougat offered a very mild malty taste and was dense and extremely chewy in texture. Truth be told the toughness of the nougat did mean it offered a little in the way of sustenance, however I still didn't find it that satisfying and found myself feeling the urge for the biscuit tin soon after.

Overall I don't like criticising products but the Slim Fast Chocolate Nutty Nougat gets a ChocolateMission thumbs down I am afraid. Despite what I said above I was expecting it to be anywhere near as satisfying or tasty as Snickers but being totally blunt the thought needn't have ever been contemplated. The real problem with this product was that the chocolate, caramel and peanuts were a complete non-factor and it may just have well of been a slab of nougat given their lack of presence in the taste. Although I probably should have expected this from a 95 calorie bar, for me this doesn't make it anymore acceptable and I for that reason I can't recommend this as an option for any ChocolateMission dieters (is that even a word!?). If you have any diet friendly chocolate items you want reviewed be sure to drop me a request.

4.8 out of 10

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

January 6th: Lotte Sasha Chocolate Original



Kcal 26 Fat 1.6g Carbs 2.6g (per 1 piece)

Today we have the second little number from my latest box of J-List goodies - these Lotte Sasha Chocolates Original. On the J-List website they come described as 'a mixture of semi-sweet chocolate, woven with white chocolate' and are supposed to cater for those 'who desire more of a sophisticated taste'. Personally I normally view snacks from the Far East as being more 'wacky' and 'innovative' (especially when it comes to flavours!) and not necessarily aimed at an older target market. To keep this review true for it's intended occasion I shared these with the rest of family over the Christmas period ... this was as sophisticated as I could get :)

I probably should have counted how many chocolates there were in the box before we dug in, though I would hazard a guess that there were about 15-20 wrapped pieces. Apologies for repeating myself from my last Japanese review but the packaging was absolutely superb - everything from the outer box to the inner chocolates were immaculate hence the 9.5 rating. Contained within inner plastic packet sleeves each piece was superbly crafted and the woven two tone chocolates looked both intricate and desirable. More to the point they looked exactly like what was promised on the front of the box which frankly I was little surprised to see be a reality.

Having admired both the packaging and the chocolates for a considerable amount of time we finally got around to eating a few and I am glad to report it was a similarly pleasurable
experience. Depending on what side you placed on the tongue first the taste was a progressive experience and delivered two unique tones of different chocolate. As with the majority of mass produced 'dark' chocolate the taste was relatively mass consumer friendly in terms of strength however it was noticeably less sugar than the white chocolate and provided a fine amount of unsweetened cocoa flavours. On the contrary the white chocolate was super sweet but this was kept in check by the aforementioned 'dark'. Bringing strong milk and vanilla influences to the party the presence of the white chocolate was certainly welcome and it was a unanimous verdict made by all that both the different chocolates worked in tandem pretty well. As you may have guessed by the nutritional information each piece was pretty miniature (4.6g) but having said that just a few at a time were a satisfying experience.

Overall these a top class that I would recommend on the basis of several reasons. Firstly the product as a whole is presented fantastically with both the box and inner chocolates not only looking classy but also very unique in craft and design. More importantly backing the looks up the actual taste of the product was magnificent - I don't think the chocolates will be winning any awards as separate entities but collaboratively they provided a taste that was nicely constructed with the two tones of chocolates contrasting superbly. Comments by the rest of family went along the lines of that they were be a perfect set of chocolates to bring to a dinner party because the packaging and presentation creates a talkability factor and the taste is better than average - you can't really ask for more than that. By my reckoning these are well worth a look at if you like the more unique snacks from the Far East.

8.2 out of 10

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

January 5th: Tesco Finest Italian Gianduiotti

Kcal 60 Fat 4.1g Fat(sats) 1.5g Carbs 4.6g (per piece)

At the back end of last year I got a request from reader Lottie for me to review a pack of these Italian Gianduiotti. Generally I do try to stay well clear of Own Label (Supermarket brand!) chocolates as there are hundreds of varieties in Tesco just alone but when I saw these sitting on the shelf they looked to be something a little different from the norm. Contrary to what I was expecting these ITALIAN Gianduiotti were genuinely Italian, and were 'produced in Italy for Tesco'. On the pack I discovered they were 'indulgent cocoa and hazelnuts milled in to a velvety paste with a soft texture and refined aroma' - that's gianduja to me and you!

These chocolates came in a 180.0g bag and set me back a pretty hefty £2.40 in the pocket. Presentation wise the product reminded me of a bag of fresh coffee but I thought it looked relatively smart none the less with the inner chocolates kept nicely fresh in thick, silver inner foil wrappers. The pieces themselves were nicely sized and could be consumed in a comfortable two mouthfuls; I felt they could have looked a little prettier though I guess it is probably a little harder to keep gianduja in a firm shape than other denser types of chocolate. Although perhaps a little underwhelming aesthetically these Gianduiotti smelt fantastic with some strong nutty scents coming to the fore as soon as they were unwrapped.

Of course with these being ginaduja chocolates the longevity of the melt in the mouth wasn't long so it was down to the strength of the flavours to make these worthwhile consuming. Thankfully I can report that they were very much worth my while and I had further confirmation of this from my family who also dug in to the bag over the few days they survived in our household. In line with expectations the melt was indeed incredibly fast and the chocolates quickly softened in to a liquid state when simply left of the tongue. Thankfully the flavours were soon forthcoming with the woody tasting hazelnuts quickly coming to the party and grabbing authority on the experience. The taste was indeed majoritly nut led though there was of course a relatively strong chocolaty background taste with the cocoa sweetened somewhat by a hint of bourbon vanilla. Each chocolate was rich yet at the same time a little moreish - I didn't want to consume more than two of these at a time though there were occasions were a thought of a third didn't feel necessarily greedy.

Overall I did like these Tesco Italian Gianduiotti but I am not sure whether I would be happy about paying £2.40 regularly to make them a frequent purchase. I have to say that I enjoyed the immensely flavoursome hazelnut experience and loved the dominance at which the nuts had in the overall taste. Personally though as a matter of personal preference I tend to like grittier praline chocolates that have just a little bit more bite and texture to them as chocolates like that seem to leave a greater lasting impression in the mouth. An example of this would be like the filling in the Schogetten Praline bar where the inner praline innards was a little differentiated in texture against the smoother outer chocolate. Regardless I would still say these are certainly worth a try if you like ginadujas or pralines - I know I would certainly welcome having them again if they were bought for me.

8.0 out of 10

Monday, 4 January 2010

January 4th: Nestle Kit Kat Sweet Potato Minis

I told you these Japanese reviews would be coming thick and fast! Today we take a look at a Kit Kat flavour that I have reviewed in one form already back in March 2009(See HERE). Indeed back in March I found the Kit Kat Sweet Potato to be somewhat of a surprising hit and it ended up scoring 8.0 out of 10 on the ChocolateMission scoring chart.

New this year J-List have sent me the latest incarnation of this flavour in the form of these Mini Roasted Sweet Potato bars, which came bundled in a multi pack of eight consisting of 4 original and 4 sweet potato flavoured.

Unlike most Japanese Kit Kats these mini ones didn't come in separate cardboard boxes but rather in a large foil bag. I am not complaining about this at all but at the same time I have to say it lacked the eccentricity of some of the single pack bigger flavours that I have reviewed previously. Below are my brief thoughts on both the flavours ...


Kit Kat Original Mini:

Kcal 66 Fat 3.6g Carbs 7.5g (per 12.3g piece)

What more can I say about a normal Kit Kat!? Just like our UK one the milk chocolate was sweet and milky and friendly to the taste. Just as with the standard sized Kit Kats there was a layer of milk chocolate creme sandwiched in the layers of the wafers which further reaffirmed the flavours of the outers chocolate. These didn't offer anything I hadn't experienced before but I am not going to complain about that now. Very Good.


Kit Kat Sweet Potato Mini

Kcal 69 Fat 4.0g Carbs 7.7g (per 12.3g)

After a little persuasion I finally persuaded a few of my other family members to taste one these - they weren't all filled with joy at the prospect of a sweet potato Kit Kat (can't say I blame them!). The comments from them were that they wouldn't have guessed it was sweet potato flavoured had they not been made aware. They suggested the main flavour influences were rooted in the white chocolate base with hints of cream and custard. Personally comparing it to the Sweet Potato Kit Kat I ate previously I similarly thought that the sweet potato didn't come through as strongly. Unlike in the bigger version I tried in March the notes of sesame, pepper and salt didn't come through as strongly. There was a starchy stirring in the background but like my family I would sturggled to pin this down as sweet potato had I not been aware. Good.


Overall these were a puzzling product to rate as I found them on the whole quite pleasant but at the same time a little disappointing. If you are buying them as a gift based on the fact that they are a 'weird sweet potato flavoured product' I guess these work out as you not only get the novelty factor but you also get a pretty friendly tasting Kit Kat that most people would like. On the other hand if it is yourself that you are buying for with the intention of tasting a genuine sweet potato flavoured chocolate you would perhaps be a little disappointed with these given the tame sweet potato taste flavours you get. Another question worth pondering is that do you really want four mini original Kit Kats when they are readily available across the globe!? On that basis I probably wouldn't recommend these as a product to get off J-List but I would certainly checkout the rest of their wonderful range of Far Eat Kit Kats. There are more Kit Kat reviews coming soon!

7.4 out of 10

Sunday, 3 January 2010

January 3rd: Mr Bunbury Madgascan Brownies

Kcal 167 Fat 9.8g Fat(sats) 5.9g Carbs 17.6g (per brownie)

Last month you may remember me taking my first look at the Mr Bunbury range in the form of the Millionaire's Shortbreads. Despite them gaining only a rather poor score of 6.2 out of 10, I couldn't not give the brand a second chance especially considering the company is so locally situated to me. Just as with the Millionaire's Shortbreads I found these Mr Bunbury Madagascan Brownies in my local Sainsbury's supermarket at the same £1.99 price point. Described as 'marvellous brownies as rich as Croesus and packed to the gunwales with highly superior Madagascar chocolate' Mr Bunbury was again talking a pretty big game, I was hoping they would fair better than the shortbreads.

My 199 pennies bought a pack of 5 brownies which I consumed across a weekly period one by one. Aesthetically the packaging looked pretty much no different to the Millionaire's Shortbreads aside from the baby blue colouring replaced with a pastel pink. Personally I wouldn't have chosen that colour myself for a brownie product though I wont get hung up on that too much. The brownies themselves were kept within individual plastic packets and although I thought they weren't the most unique or vibrant looking of products they smelt great and I was excited by the freshly baked chocolate scents that emerged.

You may have noticed that I started reviewing a fair few brownie and cake products at the back end of last year so these had pretty high standards to contend with from the outset. With the outer packaging promising high quality Madagascan chocolate I was expecting these brownies to taste insanely rich and for this part they did deliver. You could argue that for 167 calories a serving you would expect a really satisfying product but to counter that I could name several more calorific snack that are simply not as fulfilling as these brownies were. The richness was mainly rooted in the strong, unsweetened cocoa flavours that were brought to the party in each bite. The underlying cake constituents were buttery in taste with a slight lick of salt enhancing the sugar nicely. If I had one disappointment with these brownies it is that the texture felt monotonous and one dimensional and could have done with an added something like chocolate chips to bring a little bit of differentiation.

Overall these were a vast improvement on the Mr Bunbury Millionaire's Shortbreads but I still think there a few areas for improvement. The core constituents of this product were pretty much on the money and just as promised by the on-pack blurb these brownies were pretty rich tasting and left me feeling satisfied after a single piece. As I have referred to above though I couldn't help but feel that there was something a missing here and the feel of the brownies in the mouth was just a little boring and placid. With the simple introduction of either chocolate icing or chocolate chips I think these Mr Bunbury Madagascan Brownies could have a winning formula. I never like being critical of a local manufacture so I was glad to see that the guys in Kingston-Upon-Thames had a better product here. They aren't the best brownies around and are a little on the expensive side, but if you see them on an offer somewhere they are at least worth a try.

7.7 out of 10

Saturday, 2 January 2010

January 2nd: Glico Winter Kiss Almond

Kcal 363 Fat 26.2g Carbs 25.0g (per 60.0g)

Just before 2009 drew to a close my friends in the Far Eat J-List sent me another batch of goodies of their latest stock to review on ChocolateMission. Of course it goes without saying that you can expect a lot of Japanese reviews this month - from past experiences with Far East snacks I am sure they will range from the sublime to the bizarre! Kicking things off we have these Glico Winter Kiss Almond chocolates which J-List describe on their website as 'almond nuts covered in milk chocolate with a sprinkling of cocoa powder'.

These chocolate covered nuts came in a 60.0g size and were contained within an inner foil packet and cardboard box combo. As with the majority of things from the Far East the packaging was a real strength of the product and the outer box in particular was well decorated with some nice looking illustrations and Japanese wording. Inside the dainty looking box the almonds looked exactly as they did on the exterior pictures and they smelt wonderfully tempting, emanating some fine nutty scents when the foil packet was unsealed.

As I received these from J-List in December these were a product that I shared with my family over Christmas and they suited this occasion perfectly. In total these Glico Winter Kiss Almond lasted for only one day sat on our coffee table as they combined that dangerous combination of having both a moreish and fair taste. One of the things that I noticed immediately with these were the thickness of the chocolate shells, and it was nice to see that the portioning of the chocolate was generous in comparison to products such as M&M's etc. Speaking of the chocolate itself the quality wasn't quite what I would describe as the 'finest' (as the packaging stated!) but it was pleasant nonetheless with its friendly, milk rooted taste. The cocoa dusting added little in terms of flavour but it did bring the desired melty feel when each piece was placed in the mouth. Given the fair yet unremarkable standard of the chocolate a lot was going to be left up to the quality of the almonds which I can report were equally as average. The almonds were crunchy fresh, but not so fresh tasting and brought only minor buttery, nut notes to the party.

Overall it is not often I say this about a product from the Far East but these were pretty average ... mundane even! Don't get me wrong these were not bad at all, but packaging aside these Glico Winter Kiss Almond aren't anything you can't get quite readily available in the West. The quality of both the nuts and chocolate were good but not worth getting overly excited about at the same time. This may sound a little stupid but one thing I did really like was how nice the packaging looked. The Japanese always seem to do a great job presenting their snacks, though I guess some may think it is a bit on the excessive side. Based on taste I can't really recommend these as a product you should invest in or import as I am sure there has to be an equivalent product closer to hand. Based on the look of the rest of the J-List stuff there is more exciting stuff to come - take a look at the website HERE if there is anything you want me to take a look at.

7.7 out of 10

Friday, 1 January 2010

January 1st: Mars Almond

Kcal 245 Fat 12.9g Carbs 29.2g

Is there a better way to nurse your new years day hangover than reading a chocolate review from your favourite website ChocolateMission .... err OK there are probably better ways but hey now your here you may as well just give this a read ... oh and HAPPY NEW YEAR :) Kick starting this year we have this Mars Almond bar which was sent to me by ChocolateMission reader Alan. Being the geek I am I did a little research on the product and found out that it is distributed throughout middle Europe - judging by the packaging it says that it is manufactured in France. Described as 'milk chocolate with nougat, almonds and caramel' it sounded remarkably like the Snickers Almond I had reviewed previously - Click HERE to see this review.

The bar came in a 49.0g form which you wont be surprised to hear that I ate in single sitting. The outer packaging looked very familiar to the standard Mars and held many consistencies in its design with the Mars logo at the forefront of this. The differentiators for this product came in the red wood colour of the wrapper and the subtle almond branding which was placed on the logo. Looking at the bar itself it was noticeably flatter than a normal Mars and when cross-sectioned had visible almond nuts placed throughout the nougat. In regards to smell I was a little disappointed that I couldn't detect any almond or nut influence, however the expected sweet, chocolate and caramel scents were appetising to say the least.

Comparing this bar with Snickers Almond was an easy task for me as I consumed the Snickers one on mass when it was available during its limited period. To cut to the chase this bar maintained almost all of its positive attributes but unfortunately not all of them which meant I thought this Mars Almond wasn't quite on a par (very close mind!). The quality of the outer chocolate held no surprises with its sweet milky taste that cut through nicely with its chocolatyness delivering the all important chocolate flavour hit. Where this bar differed slightly was in the implementation of the almonds which had been chucked into the nougat as opposed to the caramel where they were situated in the Snickers Almond. From a totally selfish perspective I preferred the nuts being in with the caramel as this allowed the crunchy textures of the nuts to come through more which gave an added dimension in terms of textures. On a more positive note the almonds chucked in with the nougat didn't compromise the flavours whatsoever and the full span of buttery, savoury nut flavours present in the nougat still nicely contrasted with the butterscotch, sweet flavours of the caramel that lay on top. As you would expect with the smaller size this bar wasn't as fulfilling as a normal Mars, however it was still more than sufficient in satisfying the hunger I had at the time.

Overall this was yet another intriguing bar to try even though the differences observed weren't quite implemented for the better. At the end of the day this was still a very enjoyable chocolate and although I won't be swapping it for the more classical standard Mars bar anytime soon it was still nice to how the slight variation on the recipe played out. In contrast to the Snickers Almond produced in the US I would say the swapping of the placement of the almonds wasn't favourable as the nougat in a way suffocated the textures of the nuts, not allowing them to express themselves fully. As I have mentioned above though the taste at the end of the day was not compromised with nuts still inputting nicely to the usual caramel, nougat and milk chocolate combination. On a note of personal preference I would have rather the nougat had been kept chocolate flavoured rather vanilla but this really could not be cited as detrimental at all on the product in the grand scheme of things. This is certainly a product that all Mars fans should try at least once if they get the opportunity. A nice twist on what it is a fantastic original.

8.2 out of 10

Thursday, 31 December 2009

December 31st: 2009 Closing Comments

Hi All,

To bring an end to 2009 I thought I would inform you all of the plans for 2010 on ChocolateMission.

* You may have noticed that over the past 24 hours I have made some minor fascia changes and have added a Menubar for the site. In 2010 I am aiming to make significant improvements to the navigation and design. Any suggestions you have are very welcome.

* Earlier in the year I informed you that in 2010 review posts would switch to Monday, Wednesday and Friday with a 'News' post on a Saturday. At present I currently have a two month back log of reviews ... so for the time being this reduced format will not come into effect until July.

* The 2009 ChocolateMission Awards went down well and I will definitely be running this same feature in 2010.

* In 2010 I am going to be looking to complete more reader requests - If you have a request please drop me a note on the Request page.

* ..... Most exciting!???? One of the biggest frustrations I have with this site is that a great deal of the products I review from America are not readily available to us all here in Europe. I am currently looking into starting a Jim's ChocolateMission shop that stock goods from the US whilst offering competitive shipping prices for lands farther afield! This development is only in it's very stages but I hope to have something set up by mid 2010. The idea isn't for this to be a money making scheme but more of an opportunity to broaden the options open to my readers.

* Stars & Their Bars #3 is incoming .... Yep I have been pestering yet more celebs :D

* A new 'upcoming reviews' widget will be added to one of the sidebars. This way you will all be more aware what is due up on the site.

I hope this all has you excited for the new year. Any suggestions for the site are of course very welcome!

Have a great New Years Eve - Cheers to a great 2009

JIM

Wednesday, 30 December 2009

December 30th: Cadbury Milk Tray - Part 2


Roll on Part 2!! If you missed the first hald of my Cadbury Milk Tray review yesterday take a look below and familiarise yourself with my families conclusions on the first six pieces from this selection box. Today I bring you the thoughts on the final four plus the all important rating chart and 'Overall' conclusion.


Honey Love - Honey-flavour caramel. This had one a cheesy name but boy was it good! This chocolate was shaped like honey hive and it held one of the sweetest caramels I have ever tasted. I am not sure I would want to eat a whole bar of the stuff but I enjoyed the floral noted sugary centre and would say it was one of my favourites from the selection. Very Good.

Orange Truffle - Chocolate truffle flavoured with tangy orange. Oh dear this one didn't go down well! The older generation in my family were both expecting an orange fondant filled chocolate and felt robbed by the very weak tasting fruit centre. Both commented that the orange was disappointingly lacklustre in the taste. Poor.


Caramel Charm - Luxurious chewy caramel. You know the square caramel piece in Cadbury Roses!? Well add three lines of white stuff and this is what we had here! This is no criticism of course ... the soft, chewy centre lasted a long time when sucked on in the mouth and butterscotch and toffee flavours were delicious if perhaps a little weak tasting. The variation of the hard centre to all the other soft ones was very welcome. Good.

Caramel Heart - soft caramel encased in milk chocolate. This was the fourth of the caramel pieces in the selection and it was exactly what you would expect from a Cadbury caramel chocolate. The caramel was wonderfully smooth and runny with its a sweet sugary, salt hinted taste and it complimented the milky chocolate nicely. Very Good.


Overall this was a selection box full of nice tasting chocolates but there is no escaping the fact that too many of them were too similar. It is pretty safe to say that if you are not a fan of caramel or hazelnut chocolates there is not much here to get excited about. Thankfully the majority of my family are fans of both these types of chocolates so pieces like the Hazelnut Caress, Honey Love, Caramel Heart and Caramel Charm went down really quite well along with the Fudge and Turkish Delight chocolates. Unfortunately there were also a number of disappointing chocolates in the lot with the fruit flavoured and truffles pieces especially standing out as being not up to standard. As I mentioned in Part 1 of this review yesterday one particular annoyance was that Cadbury don't use Dairy Milk for the Milk Tray which strikes me as an odd decision given the name. Looking at the RRP of £5.99 I think there are better options out there for the price I can only recommend these on the basis if you are a fan of Cadbury chocolate to the core.

7.0 out of 10

Coming Tomorrow: Closing comments for the year
 

blogger templates | Make Money Online